Halloran

Crisis Response

Consumer Goods

A product recall broke on social media before the company had a statement ready.

How we rebuilt trust with regulators, press, and customers in under three weeks.

Client

National consumer goods manufacturer, ~1,100 employees

Engagement

Crisis response

Duration

3 weeks

An opened product box and printed product-inspection sheets on a boardroom table

72 hrs

from negative coverage to neutral-to-positive sentiment

45 min

to a holding statement, live on every channel

0

retailer delistings during the recall

72 hrs

from negative coverage to neutral-to-positive sentiment

45 min

to a holding statement, live on every channel

0

retailer delistings during the recall

The situation

A safety issue surfaced on social media at 6:40am, six hours before the client’s own quality team confirmed the scope internally.

By 8am, a photo of the affected product had been shared several thousand times, two regional reporters had called the switchboard, and the company’s largest retail partner was asking whether to pull stock. Internally, operations, legal and the executive team were each working from a different version of the facts, and nobody had authority to say anything publicly.

The company had a crisis manual, but it hadn’t been opened in two years, and the contact list in it included three people who had since left. The instinct in the room was to wait until the quality team finished its review. Our view was that waiting would hand the story to the people already posting about it.

Our response

Holding statement live within 45 minutes. Full stakeholder messaging (customers, retailers, regulators) drafted and approved by 11am. Executive spokesperson briefed and on two national outlets by end of day.

Priya Nair ran a single situation room with the client’s COO and general counsel, and agreed one approval route on the first call so statements didn’t queue. We separated what was confirmed from what wasn’t, and said so plainly: the holding statement acknowledged the issue, told customers exactly what to do, and committed to an update by noon. Retailers heard from the company before they heard from the press. The regulator received a factual briefing before any interview was given.

From day two, the focus shifted from containment to confidence. We published a plain-language explanation of what went wrong and what had changed on the production line, arranged for the CEO to walk a trade reporter through the fix, and gave customer service a script that answered the three questions callers were actually asking.

How it unfolded

  • Day 1, 06:40: the safety issue is first posted on social media

  • Day 1, 08:15: Halloran activated; situation room opened with the COO and general counsel

  • Day 1, 09:00: holding statement and customer guidance live on every channel

  • Day 1, 11:00: retailer, distributor and regulator briefings sent

  • Day 1, 18:00: CEO interviewed by two national outlets

  • Day 3: coverage leads with the response; sentiment turns neutral-to-positive

  • Week 3: recovery story published; client moves to a readiness retainer

What we delivered

  • Holding statement and customer guidance, published across web, social and customer service scripts

  • Retailer and distributor briefing, sent before the first national story

  • Regulator briefing note, reviewed by counsel

  • Spokesperson preparation for the CEO: key messages and the ten hardest questions

  • Twice-daily situation reports on coverage, social volume and sentiment

  • Recovery plan for weeks two and three: follow-up story, customer letter, retailer check-ins

Results

The initial coverage was critical, but the story changed within three days. By 72 hours, national coverage led with the company’s response rather than the fault, and social sentiment had moved from negative to neutral-to-positive. No retailer delisted the product line. Three weeks later, the client moved to a readiness retainer so the plan, statements and approval map would exist before the next incident.

What made the difference wasn’t speed alone. Every audience heard one consistent account, in the right order, from the company itself. The approval route agreed on that first call is now written into the client’s crisis plan, alongside pre-approved statements for four other scenarios.

The takeaway

If your crisis plan hasn’t been opened in a year, assume the contact list and approval route are wrong. The fix takes an afternoon: confirm who can approve a holding statement on their own, pre-draft one for your most likely product scenario, and have counsel sign it off now, while nothing is happening.

“They had a plan ready before we’d finished our internal call.”

— VP Communications, client (name withheld per NDA)

Led by

Portrait of Priya Nair, Head of Crisis Response

Priya Nair

Head of Crisis Response

Led by

Portrait of Priya Nair, Head of Crisis Response

Priya Nair

Head of Crisis Response

Facing something similar?

Tell us what’s happening. A partner will reply within one business day.

Everything you share is confidential.

Facing something similar?

Tell us what’s happening. A partner will reply within one business day.

Everything you share is confidential.

Buy Template

Create a free website with Framer, the website builder loved by startups, designers and agencies.